Sunday 9 May 2004 The Diana PhotosLast month my column was about the new Diana
tapes. As an admitted Diana devotee, I had to admit that I find it hard to get enough of
the late princess. To me, the videotapes and audio conversations offered a refreshing and
unfiltered glimpse into who Diana really was. This month is different. This month the new
picture I saw of the princess was far from refreshing but it was definitely filtered --
filtered by TV producers who lack the most basic sense of class, respect and dignity.
Driven by greed and ratings, the powers-that-be at the American television network CBS,
decided to air photocopied images of the Princess of Wales immediately after that fatal
crash in Ive never been so glad not to be a member of the media. As a graduate of journalism school and a former reporter, Im wondering how we got to this place. Theres no question that the public has always had an appetite for the inappropriate and macabre and journalists have always been tempted by exclusives and news items that cross the line. In fact, as part of my journalism education, we
had an ethics class in which we reviewed different pieces of controversial videotape and
discussed what we would and would not air. We decided the clip of a journalist getting
shot and killed in For years, the photographs were offered to
journalists and news outlets all over the world, particularly in So what changed? What made it seem like a good
idea to publicize a picture that shows a woman in her last moments? What made them think
the publicity and profit would make up for the new low they sunk to? I wish I knew. Too bad ethics class doesnt
extend beyond the classroom. - Stephanie |
Previous columns can be found in the archive
This page and its contents are �2005 Copyright by Geraldine Voost and may not be
reproduced without the authors permission. Stephanie's column is �2005 Copyright by Stephanie who
has kindly given permission for it to be displayed on this website.
This page was last updated on: Sunday, 29-Aug-2004 21:13:11 CEST