Sunday 16 January 2005 Intergenerational RoyalsOch! I
just realized that I have probably become a middle-aged fogy! And it is all Prince Harrys fault. In recent months I have been increasingly irritated
and concerned by his partying and punch-outs with paparazzi, and even more concerned about
his politically incorrect crush on that admittedly looksome (and underdressed) lass from
Zimbabwe, but this Nazi uniform incident is simply the final straw! Doesnt the laddie get it? He is starting to come across as something of a
privileged young thug. What are the kids of
this generation coming to?! But wait a minute
I am, after all, a
slightly younger member of his dads generation
.
Hmm. Though they originated in the The Queen and Duke of Edinburgh are from the
Builder/Silent generation, those born in the wake of WWI, who grew up through the Great
Depression and fought (or in the Queens case all but fought) in WWII. They are patriotic, hard-working, and people of
strong values. They emerged from the deepest
darkest parts of the 20th century abyss to rebuild and create the postwar
world, and carried us through and beyond the Cold War.
In a very real sense they have worked to hold it all together, and pass it
on. The Queens elder children, Prince Charles
and the Princess Royal, are classic elder baby-boomers.
The Prince of Wales falls into roughly the same age range as Prime Minister
Blair, and Bill Clinton, and George W. Bush. Like
the leading men of his generation he can be idealistic, egotistical, and self-indulgent. But they can also work hard. Their generation grew up through the youth
rebellion of the 60s, the anti-war movements, sex, drugs, and rock n roll. Though not a self-identified feminist,
the Princess Royal also shares some of the characteristics of the women of her generation
in having fought her way to success beyond the traditional bounds of being a proper
princess. Shes knocked hard on her own
version of the glass ceiling, and broken through. For
both the Prince and Princess, the world is less certain for them than for their parents,
but it is also less restricted. The Queens younger sons are either late
boomers or early X-ers, and like their contemporaries they seem
sometimes somewhat adrift, and they can be rather self-centered and/or cynical. X-ers are said to be more dependent on their
parents than boomers. Their growing-up world
was more the mid to late-70s and early 80s. The
Duke of York, of course, shared one of the most dramatic coming-of-age experiences of his
era in the William and Harry, in turn, are pretty clearly
members of the Millennium Generation. The
youth of this generation can either be extremely aware and together and caring, or really
pretty materialistic and self-centered. Some
descriptions say that they try to grow up too fast, and lack good role models. They are also the kids of the most recent
technological revolution. And they are the
generation that stood at the cusp of adulthood on And so, let me be clear that saying that the
various royals are as much a product of their times and generations as of their other life
circumstances does NOT explain away or excuse sheer youthful insensitivity and idiocy such
as Prince Harrys most recent escapade. But
it does make me mindful that he was born in relation to World War II about like I was born
in relation to World War I. Which is to say
that it IS ancient history to his generation, and he really probably doesnt
get it at all. But he should. It also makes me mindful that when we look at the
royals, the issues and problems we may choose to critique in them are often the issues of
their whole generation writ large, and viewed from the perspective of our own
generations to boot. Once upon a time, in a very different world, it
was not known that the children of George V shared some of the worst characteristics and
vices of their generation, as well as some of the best and most heroic virtues. But they were very much the products of their era. Now we often seem to know far too much about the
children and grandchildren of Elizabeth II. But
under the microscope we may forget that they still share the virtues and vices of the rest
of us. When we point at them are we really
pointing at ourselves in the mirror? (My
Buddhist friends would say, Yes! And
that if we dont realize it, were in trouble.) And as for Harry, if I were recommending the
remedial program du jour, Id say to send
him over to his war veteran grandpa to have a good chat, and then trot him off with Philip
to a British Legion meeting. The aspiring
soldier would probably learn a lot, and that in very short order! And, if I were the Duke of Edinburgh, I would not
fail to forcefully remind my grandson that his great-grandmother, Princess Alice, is one
of the Righteous Gentiles memorialized in So -- for a
that! -- as we begin 2005 Id offer you a traditional Scots toast: Heres tae us! Whas like us? Damn few mores the pity. - Ken Cuthbertson |
Previous columns can be found in the archive
This page and its contents are �2008 Copyright by Geraldine Voost and may not be
reproduced without the authors permission. The Laird o'Thistle column is �2008 Copyright by Kenneth Cuthbertson who has kindly given permission for it to be displayed on this website.
This page was last updated on: Sunday, 16-Jan-2005 11:14:55 CET