Friday 3 December 2004 Wilful Replies: Your LettersDear Readers, it appears that the last column may have been a bit controversial. (Cough). Clearly, your spirited replies demanded early attention. Here is a sampling of your varied, and strongly held opinions on the subject of Prince William. Some have been edited for space: * * * 1. I'm a bit
puzzled as to why you are so concerned about HRH Prince William of Wales. Both his father
and grandmother agreed that he would not enter 'public life' until he is finished with
university. I really feel you are being too harsh; (He) has done nothing so far
to warrant such criticism. I do agree that something is up with that branch (of 3)
of the Royal Family...I've said for a few years that I would not be surprised if all three
eventually renounce their rights and leave Britain. Hope not, but I wouldn't be
surprised. That is why I keep telling people, (to little avail so far), to keep
their eyes on the Duke of York and his eldest daughter
Oh, and only the senior
members of the Royal Family (who are colonels) are 'on the ground' at the Cenotaph
ceremony; they review several parades of soldiers at various times around Remembrance
Sunday. They don't just mill about afterward (there are too many people) and the
security is a nightmare (if a bomb went off the ENTIRE British Establishment would go); I
understand William went right to the airport and back to Scotland. My question about all this: Why the interview in
the first place? It would have been more appropriate for after he's finished
university, when he actually has something to say...but there you are.
Meanwhile, keep observing. Thomas R. EWK: Another brilliant email from you Sir.
Thank you for sharing your thoughts. *
* * 2.
I'm
not exactly sure what you think they'd ask a 22 year old that they haven't asked before.
He's already made it very clear he isn't going to answer questions about his personal
life, which I think is incredibly smart, and something he should NEVER do considering the
trouble his parents got into and caused when they did. And presuming that he would
lead men into battle really isn't a presumption. If he went to Sandhurst, he would be an
Officer, and therefore would be leading men. Though I doubt he'd ever be allowed to lead
them into battle, just as Charles was never allowed near any conflict. Tamara R. EWK: Prince
William is not yet trained for combat, let alone an officer.
Yet, he discussed his intentions for his role in a position which he has not
yet been awarded. As a man born into another
role which coincidentally he also did not earn, it would seem that he of all people would
be especially motivated to earn his military stripes before wearing them. On another note, for a fellow who claims not to
want to cross any bridges before he comes to them, it seemed to me that he prospectively
crossed an ocean with that one. * * *
Anonymous * * * 4. Ah, at last, someone has noticed that the
"little emperor" of the British Empire Joan * * * 5. I know the first thing Williams
comments triggered in me was a comparison to the future Edward VIIIs, during World
War I, where he told the commanding general that he was expendable as he had four
brothers, and thus should be allowed in the front lines.
The general responded that he wasnt worried about Edward getting
killed, but getting captured. And THAT I think
is what will keep William off the front lines in any future war. Dont know why you didnt bring that up
but
generally, I prefer an ours not to make reply, ours not to reason why, ours but to
do and die towards Royals personal decisions.
Louis E. EWK: Interesting historical footnote. Thank you for your insight. As to the last part of your email, if I were to follow that strategy, I would be out of a job doing online commentary. * * * 6. I think
William is much like his adored Mother, and enjoys the game. He learned from both his
parents about manipulating and hiding from the press. I would hope that he does soon step
up to the plate and begin official duties now and then. The people of Britain deserve to
see something of the man who would be their King. If he wants their support, he'd better
get busy and make plans to ensure they get their wish. Anonymous *
* * 7. Your crack
about Jecca's dress was so funny! I saw a photo of it in Hello; the hat made it a really
bizarre choice for one of the top weddings in that country. I too think it cannot be easy
for Kate if she has feelings for William - they are living together - to see him with
other girls. Not fun! Dakota EWK: I do wonder how likely
it is that he will ever again have an opportunity to quietly get to know a young woman
over a three to four year period without the prying lens of the media. But, whether or not he and Kate Middleton are
now or ever were dating is somewhat beside the point, right?
He sees a benefit to himself arising from any story that causes public
confusion regarding his personal life, so he says nothing to rebuke Miss Middletons
unflattering media portrayal. Of course, he is not consistently silent when it comes to all stories on
all friends. It seems that the Princes
willingness to speak out for a friend is in direct proportion to what he thinks he will
gain from it. The converse is also true. * * * 8. I liked the first part of
this piece very much - it is insightful, controversial, and brave in view of the fact that
William has been presented as the answer to all the Monarchy's problems. In my opinion, it
lost momentum in the second half where there was too much about William's involvement with
Kate Middleton. At only 22 he cannot yet be expected to get engaged or married
I
realize that the episode with Kate was used as an example of how William has been
manipulating the Press, and his own image, but it's clear that he is obviously
far from ready for adult emotional commitment
His youth does not excuse him
from attending important National occasions though. The people expect it and are dismayed
when it doesn't happen
Keep the thought- provoking columns coming. Name Withheld Upon Request * * * 9. Why write
about the royals when you dislike them so much? Deanna N. EWK:
Actually, my previous columns belie your assertions, most especially with respect to
Prince William. But if you are looking for a
cheerleader who ratifies everything that the Prince does, you are reading the wrong
columnist. * * * After the past
week I can say with certainty that the Royal Family is fortunate to have so many web-logs
(blogs) with intelligent contributors like you weighing in. It makes it a joy and a privilege to pen this
column, and I am very, very thankful to those of you who wrote in; a special thanks to the
impassioned critics who wrote angry blogs on various websites about the column, and to
those who responded in spirited defense. I am
now wearing my Kevlar vest wherever I go. So,
let the debate begin. And to those who think I
was especially hard on Prince William, take heart. At
the ripe old age of 22 (!) he may still have a slight
window of opportunity to prove me
wrong. ;-) - Elizabeth W. King |
This page and its contents are �2005 Copyright by Geraldine Voost and may not be
reproduced without the authors permission. Elizabeth King's column is �2005 Copyright by Elizabeth King who has kindly given permission for it to be displayed on this website.
This page was last updated on: Friday, 03-Dec-2004 14:17:20 CET