Saturday 27 November 2004 Won'tPrince William, who prefers to have others call
him Will, gave an interview last week; once again, not only through what was
said but also through what was not said, revealed a good bit about himself to those who
have been paying attention. I was delighted to
see that we will no longer mince words. Personally, I must confess to have grown tired of
it. To that end, I for one cannot help but
sense that the Prince talks a good game about work, the future, and his principles, but
when it comes to putting words into actions, Will
WONT. First, the interview: Who among us failed to
shake our heads sadly when watching the Prince declare, If I join the military, then
I insist on leading my men on the battlefield. It would be so humiliating otherwise. I guess Wont is sensitive to being
humiliated by the decisions of others. Ironic, isnt it? But more on that, later. One thing that many have already observed was that
the Prince is a tad presumptuous when it comes to his military qualifications. A fellow who has had little meaningful training in
combat, and rather symbolically gave a pass to all of the D-Day Remembrance services,
(including those in Britain), who could not even muster the courage to come down from a
balcony during the Cenotaph Ceremony, and disappeared after 25 short minutes, indeed even
failing to observe the parade of real soldiers, now finds himself on the precipice
of being qualified not only to fight a war, but to lead men into battle? Hmmm. Was he joking? Sadly, no. Some would say that the
young prince is suffering from delusions of competency.
Is it his fault or the fault of others who have mollycoddled him
(his words, not mine) and repeatedly ratified every poor decision he has made? Remember when he failed to show up to the official
launch party for the sole book ever sponsored by the Estate of his late mother? Rather than stop by to thank these remarkable
people for their tireless work, Wont opted instead to party a few blocks away at a
high-profile guido-ish nightclub where he was photographed leaving (smiling from ear to
ear) with a group of chums late in the evening. His
formal excuse at the time he declined the invitation to the Wednesday night book launch? He had an important prior commitment, of course. Forgive me Sir, but for a fellow who has claimed
two times in four months not to want to be wrapped in cotton wool you
certainly appear most at ease when you are, in fact, wool-wrapped. For at his core, Will is a bundle of
wonts. Yes, he does have the
courage to face the press, but not the courage to speak meaningfully on any subject: The evolution of the monarchy? Too complicated to contemplate. The influence of his mother? Too upsetting to discuss. The very real failings of his father? Not worthy of acknowledgement. The accomplishments of his brother? Hes
taking my ideas. Please. I could go on and on. The part that causes me the most consternation,
though, has nothing to do with what Wont says (or doesnt say) in any specific
interview. Instead, it is the five consistent
themes that he weaves within each one: 1. The
media should leave me alone or I will pout, kick, and scream until I get my way; 2. I want
to live anonymously; 3. I obsess over losing control; 4. I have no intention of fulfilling
my role any time soon; and 5. I dont listen to sound advice if it in any way impugns
my narcissistic predilections. Very
good. Well, the problem with items 1 through 3
is that Prince William is clearly on a trip to De-Nile if he thinks that A. the media will
leave him alone; B. he is ever going to live life anonymously; or C. that he is in control
of his ultimate career. Kicking, pouting,
screaming, or, (in what appears to be his M.O. of choice), hiding are not going to
change the reality. But he has definitely
achieved one thing by staying true to the 4th recurrent theme of the
interviews: We are now fairly certain that Wont is knee-deep in an identity crisis.
But does he consistently shun his role and all that comes with it? Of course not. In
fact, he is quite happy to use his position in order to indulge in fun and unique
activities that would otherwise be inaccessible to common folk. And so at this point it would appear that
Wont has befriended hypocrisy, and so far, is quite pleased with the relationship. Surely for a fellow who claims to cling to the
notion of control, Wont seizes the opportunity in the one area in his life
where he can exercise total control, and makes honorable choices with respect to
the people in his real life, right? Nope. For
instance, consider the way in which he visibly shuddered at the possible humiliating prospect of being denied what he
clearly believes is his right to lead his men as an officer. Who amongst us fails to shudder at the thought of
humiliation? Yet Prince William seems
perfectly content to subject various friends to near constant humiliation. Take for instance, the recent case of his one-time
girlfriend Kate Middleton, in which she was deployed by the Prince as a vehicle of media
manipulation in order to confuse the speculation about his love life. First, he paraded her around in Klosters, (not
exactly a private venue devoid of paparazzi), in order to introduce her to the world. Then on his birthday, he made sure to be
photographed hugging and kissing someone else on the cheek at a polo match where Kate was
notably absent. Then in July it emerged that Kate was somewhat akin to an occasional
pastime, as she was still his girlfriend, but he was at the same time planning a visit to
Jecca Craig in Kenya. When he got wind that
that wasnt well received by the public, he backed off the original plan and stuck to
seeing Jecca in These stories have continued to appear with
alarming frequency, always with Kate Middleton alternately named as his serious girlfriend
with whom he holidayed, or his soon to be ex-girlfriend left by the wayside while William
enjoyed the company of more fun-loving, racy girls. Most recently we learned that he attended two
different weddings this Fall and left Kate Middleton home for both. But who is the beneficiary of the public confusion?
Who is suffering from it? Is Wont confused, or is Kate being used? Sure
--perhaps they broke up. But if so, it is a startling comment on his
character that he continues to use his possible relationship with her even now as
part of a game whose sole objective is to confuse the media about his life. Lofty aspirations, indeed. His actions make clear that he places a
significantly higher premium on creating confusion amongst members of the public whom
he does not even know, than he does on preventing further humiliation to his
most loyal friend from So the result is a nearly constant succession of
stories with the same general theme, and apparent complicity from those in Clarence House
who supposedly speak for the Prince. Since William is now promoting himself as a surfer
dude, perhaps he should have realized by now that he has probably ridden this wave about
as far as it will take him. But no, he cannot
be bothered to issue a simple statement of disgust at the medias persistent
exploitation of this young woman whom one can only guess believed at some point that he
loved her, too. (Why else would she have gone
along for this horrendous ride?) But perhaps the reason why William is not all
that disgusted is because he is himself the primary architect behind the stories: Several
of his friends suggest that solely in order to confuse the media, he may
have elected to leave his girlfriend at home while he attended the society wedding of one
of his best friends. Translation: He might still be shagging her, but far more can be
gained in the media wars if he keeps her out of sight. Clearly, that is much more
important than hurt feelings from being left home, right? --My how things have changed
since April. (But the so-called racy Jecca
Craig is still around, and no doubt due to her more attractive qualities, was included in
the wedding. And lucky for us that she was.
Arriving in a costume that was once worn by Clint Eastwood in Unforgiven, she
showed the world that subtlety is her middle name.) Is Prince Williams active use of Kate
Middleton in the media game illustrative of what he meant when he told us during his 21st
birthday interview that girls who got involved with him didnt understand
everything that came with knowing him? I
guess so. And when some tenacious reporters
from the News of the World managed to track the uniquely self-possessed Kate down in And speaking of collateral damage, it seems pretty clear that William puts public perception via media gamesmanship on a higher plane than looking after the feelings of others. Sadly, this includes the most loyal of friends. Along the same vein then, it seems reasonable to assume that he would also deem acceptable other forms of collateral damage, so long as his public image does not suffer. And this is a fellow who wishes to lead men into battle during wartime? Thats interesting. Really. Just hope you arent a member of his regiment. - Elizabeth W. King |
This page and its contents are �2005 Copyright by Geraldine Voost and may not be
reproduced without the authors permission. Elizabeth King's column is �2005 Copyright by Elizabeth King who has kindly given permission for it to be displayed on this website.
This page was last updated on: Saturday, 27-Nov-2004 10:00:32 CET